Unfinished Fanfics are Okay

anoceaninthesun:

I’ve seen a couple other people mention it, so I’m just gonna weigh in and say to readers of fanfics, it is absolutely none of your business how many WIPs someone has going at a time. If someone has twenty unfinished stories and wants to make another, well, good for them. Unless the writer explicitly asks for your opinion on whether they should finish stories before starting new ones, you should just keep from commenting. 

I have even gotten reviews on newer fics before bitching about neglecting older stories that I had already explained why I wasn’t actively working on anymore, but had decided to leave them up just in case. Once a fic already goes up, it is up to the writer to decide what to do with it. So once again, LET PEOPLE WRITE AS MANY FICS AS THEY WANT. 

weirddyke:

i love seeing elderly women who clearly have reached that point where they don’t care about how they’re perceived anymore and are fully engaged with life on their own terms. idk that sounds deep but im just really happy to see this woman on the train rn with pink streaks in her hair wearing bright green new balance sneakers and reading a stephen king novel with a book of crosswords sticking out of her suitcase. i feel like ideally at some point in old age women return to the freedom and unselfconsciousness of pre-pubescent girlhood

Wtf is wrong with Crisis Core Aerith???

lilly-white:

OK here’s my bulletpoint presentation:

An overwhelming majority of anime and japanese video games have simplistic characters. In most of them, you have a set of maybe five or six different “types” of characters that get consistently used. For men, you have the happy-go-lucky/immature guy, the pretty brooding guy, the alpha male guy, the intellectual (often literature-loving or glasses-wearing) guy. For women, you have the pure maiden, the cute mascot, the female version of the pretty brooding guy, and the sexed up bimbo. This doesn’t really hamper my enjoyment of anime – but if I’m honest, I get bored real fast if the characters never evolve out of the neat category that they are presented in.  

Now the great thing about the original PSX FFVII was that they incorporated a lot of English slang in their translations of the dialogue, which added notions of class awareness and depth to the characters (which is important within this particular game meta, because of its denouncements of classism among other things). And with the limited animation and the fact of not being able to hear their voices, you could imagine all kinds of intonations and attitudes, and thus you could interpret the characters as having more complex personalities which didn’t fit into the aforementionned stereotypes. 

In the OG, Aeris is a firecracker, she’s sassy, unafraid, pushy, she flirts in a very self-assured way. She’s curious, very self-aware and goes towards people and towards danger. She’s interesting. In Crisis Core, she is pretty much the contrary of all that. Her attitude ticks all the boxes of the “pure maiden” stereotype. She’s ditzy, afraid of the goddamn sky, often has her hands up in front of her chest/mouth in a very clichéd “I’m scared and delicate” gesture, has this soft high-pitched voice, and also doesn’t seem to have a life outside of Zack. Her entire narrative arc is constructed around Zack. 

My main beef is that they took a lot of grit and independence out of her character to make her more accessible as the Pure Maiden Love Interest. Sure, she’s younger, but we get flashbacks of young!Aeris in the OG too and young!Aeris is just as brash and blunt and adventurous as OG Aeris. Young!Aeris talks back to the Turks. Crisis Core!Aeris lacks continuity with what we see of her the OG. Also, they totally stripped her relationships with Zack and Tseng of any psychological maturity. CC!Tseng is portrayed as “the good guy”, god knows why, perhaps because Squeenix knew he was favoured by the fanbase. You rarely see them interact. In the OG, it’s implied that they have a rich and murky past, in which Tseng behaves abusively towards her. But here? Nah let’s take that grit out of the game. As for her relationship with Zack, it’s laughably naïve. In the OG, he was portrayed as a “lady’s man” and Aeris seemed to imply that the relationship wasn’t all that serious, because she’s been around and knows her shit when it comes to living as a young pretty girl in the slums. But in Crisis Core, not only does she ONLY exist as Zack’s love interest, the love in question is written in a very emotionally immature and “idealized” kind of way. And it’s implied that she herself is very naïve about men and relationships. Which doesn’t add up with how she flirts pretty outrageously with Cloud in the OG.

tl;dr: I like interesting, complex characters, and Crisis Core Aeris is a defanged, desexed, simplified husk of OG!Aeris. If you disagree, that’s your opinion and you’re entitled to it, and I’m not gonna say anything more. 😉 

Iowa governor signs restrictive abortion ban known as ‘heartbeat bill’

korrasera:

fandomsandfeminism:

shamethepainaway:

fandomsandfeminism:

shamethepainaway:

fandomsandfeminism:

stfuprolifers:

This is tragic news. Anti-choicers are so fucking ignorant and cruel with their insidious TRAP laws. Most people don’t even realize they’re pregnant until AFTER six weeks. 

‘…doctors are not allowed to perform an abortion before testing for a fetal heartbeat. It requires a physician to notify the woman seeking an abortion in writing whether a heartbeat is detected and that abortion is barred in the event that it is detected. Fetal heartbeats can be detected as early as six weeks into a pregnancy. Critics have pointed out that the legislation would effectively ban abortion at six weeks and before a woman is aware that she is pregnant.

Fred Hubbell, a candidate for the Democratic nomination in the upcoming governor’s race, said in a statement that Reynolds “has once again proven that she is willing to put political extremism over the health, well-being and rights of Iowa women.“ 

“This bill will be the vehicle that will ultimately provide change and provide the opportunity to overturn Roe v. Wade,” Iowa Republican state senator Rick Bertrand said of the legislation during floor debate. “There’s nothing hidden here about the agenda. You know, today the pro-life movement won a battle, but the war rages on.“’

Im so fucking angry. This is evil.

Good maybe you’ll realize you’re killing a fucking baby

Terminating a pregnancy isnt killing a baby, ya lollipop. A fetus isnt a baby.

And, for the record, whether or not a fetus is  baby isnt really the point. Fully grown conscious people don’t get to violate my bodily autonomy, even to save their own lives. If my neighbor hit me with a car and I will DIE if they don’t donate blood to save me, they can’t be FORCED to donate blood. It’s a CHOICE, even when a life is on the line

denying that a fetus is not an autonomous human being is pretty fucking sick to be honest. 

A fetus ISNT autonomous.

Like, literally. It does not have autonomy. Its literally physically dependent on the physical body of the pregnant person to be alive.

And, again, whether or not a fetus is autonomous isnt the point. Fully grown conscious AUTONOMOUS people don’t get to violate my bodily autonomy, even to save their own lives. If my neighbor hit me with a car and I will DIE if they don’t donate blood to save me, they can’t be FORCED to donate blood. It’s a CHOICE, even when a life is on the line

Since @shamethepainaway’s response to this was to say ‘lol k’ and ask @fandomsandfeminism if she was the developmentally disabled by using a slur, I think this is a good time to explain why everything shamethepainaway said about this is really really asinine.

Autonomous means that you are capable of controlling your own actions or basically staying alive on your own power. When applied to an organism, it means that it’s a discrete organism all itself that can move around, eat, and in general live on its own. It’s not a part of another organism or wholly dependent on another organism to live.

In other words, fetuses are literally not autonomous. They can’t live outside of the womb and don’t possess a mind that can make a decision on its own. In fact, human development is such that we really only reach biological autonomy, “Will I continue to live if I’m no longer being kept alive by my parent’s womb,” between a few weeks before and after birth, and we then continue to gain autonomy as we age and learn more about our own abilities and our ability to control our environment.

Also, a fetus isn’t a baby. Like, it takes most of the duration of the pregnancy for a fetus to develop into what we’d call a baby, but if someone like shamethepainaway calls a fetus a baby they’re hoping that you’ll have an emotional reaction and stop thinking about the situation critically. Their purpose is to make you feel disgust so you’ll be more susceptible when they try to manipulate you into agreeing with them.

I don’t really like attacking people’s intelligence, because intelligence comes in many forms and many of those forms get no respect, so you won’t hear me talking about shamethepainaway’s IQ. But proud ignorance? Boy howdy I am okay with pointing out someone being a proudly ignorant jackass.

Iowa governor signs restrictive abortion ban known as ‘heartbeat bill’

captainsaku:

I found these tags on that post asking adults to list their age. This is one of many who seem to agree with OP’s sentiment.

I think kids on the internet these days–and by “kids” I mean anyone under 18 honestly–need to be re-taught about internet safety and keeping your personal life away from your internet life, for safety reasons. I’ve been noticing this a lot lately, but I’ve found that the younger generations just never learned about Internet safety and keeping your personal information… well, personal.

Listen. I am a 90s kid in my late 20s. Yes, I do list my age on my description, because I feel comfortable doing so. But lately, there’s been an alarming trend where you, the younger generations, expect us to cater to all of your needs and keep you safe. And more, even.

The internet is a big, scary place. People my age and older, and some a little younger, grew up with the internet. We grew up with the dial-up noise and “get off the internet so I can use the phone!” and being limited in the way we interacted with the internet because it was expensive and strange and modems were not a thing. We also grew up with massive internet safety campaigns and worried parents scared of the unknown. Scared of the predator on the other side of the screen. It was normal for parents to be worried and assume predator until proven otherwise. 

As such, everyone in my generation and older grew up with a massive internet safety awareness. Don’t give out your personal information, don’t tell them where you live, your name, your age, where you study or what. Say nothing. Share nothing. Most of us have created for ourselves internet personas, much in the way that I am Saku on the internet but someone else in real life.

Yes, the line has blurred somewhat, and over time people have lost the alarm and concern that the internet caused in them. But most of us still remember what it was like back then. Most of us remember the safety rules, remember the techniques and tactics to tell if someone was or wasn’t telling the truth, remember the golden rule about not sharing personal information on the internet.

Because the internet back then was a big, scary place. And the internet now? It still is a big, scary place. It’s just more…. normal. More a part of our everyday lives that we all just sort of take for granted. 

What you kids are missing now is that we, as the older generations on the internet, the generations that grew up with the internet, still remember what it was like back then. And we still abide by our internet safety rules.

You all may think that sharing your age on the internet is not a big deal, but it is. Whatever you post on the internet can be used against you, regardless of how “safe” you feel. And one way or another, we are not responsible for you or your internet experiences. We protected ourselves back then, we policed and monitored our own internet content and use, and so should you.

The internet is not yours, it’s all of ours. And we got here first, way before you were even born, in some cases. I’ve been on the internet since I was 9, and that’s well over a decade and a half ago. If anything, fandom spaces are made up primarily of adults. Who do you think writes the good content that you consume? Who do you think produces the best art and the best fics? Who do you think writes the well-written, hot, sexy smut you shouldn’t be reading at 3 in the morning?

When we got here, we all assumed that everyone was older than us on the internet. For some reason that’s changed, and now people assume that everyone’s younger, or their age. But we’re all still here. We’ve been here for the past 15, 20 years. Even longer.

There is nothing wrong with us. We don’t owe you anything. You make your own safety on the internet, and you are the one responsible for making sure you’re safe. That’s not on us, it’s on you. 

If you’re uncomfortable talking to an adult on the internet, then you’re more than welcome to unfollow, or block, or whatever. But it’s not our responsibility that you do so. If you want to know something, ask.

Most importantly, we’re not all predators. Don’t shame or fault us for existing on the Internet. We were here before you, and we enjoy things just as you do. They aren’t yours, you don’t own them any more than we do. And we have a right to be here too, without having to bend over backwards for you just for existing.

We’re Ready

jumpingjacktrash:

shannonhale:

I was presenting an assembly for kids grades 3-8 while on book tour for the third PRINCESS ACADEMY book.

Me: “So many teachers have told me the same thing. They say, ‘When I told my students we were reading a book called PRINCESS ACADEMY, the girls said—’”

I gesture to the kids and wait. They anticipate what I’m expecting, and in unison, the girls scream, “YAY!”

Me: “’And the boys said—”

I gesture and wait. The boys know just what to do. They always do, no matter their age or the state they live in.

In unison, the boys shout, “BOOOOO!”

Me: “And then the teachers tell me that after reading the book, the boys like it as much or sometimes even more than the girls do.”

Audible gasp. They weren’t expecting that.

Me: “So it’s not the story itself boys don’t like, it’s what?”
The kids shout, “The name! The title!”

Me: “And why don’t they like the title?”

As usual, kids call out, “Princess!”

But this time, a smallish 3rd grade boy on the first row, who I find out later is named Logan, shouts at me, “Because it’s GIRLY!”

The way Logan said “girly"…so much hatred from someone so small. So much distain. This is my 200-300th assembly, I’ve asked these same questions dozens of times with the same answers, but the way he says “girly” literally makes me take a step back. I am briefly speechless, chilled by his hostility.

Then I pull it together and continue as I usually do.

“Boys, I have to ask you a question. Why are you so afraid of princesses? Did a princess steal your dog? Did a princess kidnap your parents? Does a princess live under your bed and sneak out at night to try to suck your eyeballs out of your skull?”

The kids laugh and shout “No!” and laugh some more. We talk about how girls get to read any book they want but some people try to tell boys that they can only read half the books. I say that this isn’t fair. I can see that they’re thinking about it in their own way.

But little Logan is skeptical. He’s sure he knows why boys won’t read a book about a princess. Because a princess is a girl—a girl to the extreme. And girls are bad. Shameful. A boy should be embarrassed to read a book about a girl. To care about a girl. To empathize with a girl.

Where did Logan learn that? What does believing that do to him? And how will that belief affect all the girls and women he will deal with for the rest of his life?

At the end of my presentation, I read aloud the first few chapters of THE PRINCESS IN BLACK. After, Logan was the only boy who stayed behind while I signed books. He didn’t have a book for me to sign, he had a question, but he didn’t want to ask me in front of others. He waited till everyone but a couple of adults had left. Then, trembling with nervousness, he whispered in my ear, “Do you have a copy of that black princess book?”

He wanted to know what happened next in her story. But he was ashamed to want to know.

Who did this to him? How will this affect how he feels about himself? How will this affect how he treats fellow humans his entire life?

We already know that misogyny is toxic and damaging to women and girls, but often we assume it doesn’t harm boys or mens a lick. We think we’re asking them to go against their best interest in the name of fairness or love. But that hatred, that animosity, that fear in little Logan, that isn’t in his best interest. The oppressor is always damaged by believing and treating others as less than fully human. Always. Nobody wins. Everybody loses. 

We humans have a peculiar tendency to assume either/or scenarios despite all logic. Obviously it’s NOT “either men matter OR women do.” It’s NOT “we can give boys books about boys OR books about girls.” It’s NOT “men are important to this industry OR women are.“ 

It’s not either/or. It’s AND.

We can celebrate boys AND girls. We can read about boys AND girls. We can listen to women AND men. We can honor and respect women AND men. And And And. I know this seems obvious and simplistic, but how often have you assumed that a boy reader would only read a book about boys? I have. Have you preselected books for a boy and only offered him books about boys? I’ve done that in the past. And if not, I’ve caught myself and others kind of apologizing about it. “I think you’ll enjoy this book EVEN THOUGH it’s about a girl!” They hear that even though. They know what we mean. And they absorb it as truth.

I met little Logan at the same assembly where I noticed that all the 7th and 8th graders were girls. Later, a teacher told me that the administration only invited the middle school girls to my assembly. Because I’m a woman. I asked, and when they’d had a male author, all the kids were invited. Again reinforcing the falsehood that what men say is universally important but what women say only applies to girls.

One 8th grade boy was a big fan of one of my books and had wanted to come, so the teacher had gotten special permission for him to attend, but by then he was too embarrassed. Ashamed to want to hear a woman speak. Ashamed to care about the thoughts of a girl.

A few days later, I tweeted about how the school didn’t invite the middle school boys. And to my surprise, twitter responded. Twitter was outraged. I was blown away. I’ve been talking about these issues for over a decade, and to be honest, after a while you feel like no one cares. 

But for whatever reason, this time people were ready. I wrote a post explaining what happened, and tens of thousands of people read it. National media outlets interviewed me. People who hadn’t thought about gendered reading before were talking, comparing notes, questioning what had seemed normal. Finally, finally, finally.

And that’s the other thing that stood out to me about Logan—he was so ready to change. Eager for it. So open that he’d started the hour expressing disgust at all things “girly” and ended it by whispering an anxious hope to be a part of that story after all. 

The girls are ready. Boy howdy, we’ve been ready for a painful long time. But the boys, they’re ready too. Are you?

I’ve spoken with many groups about gendered reading in the last few years. Here are some things that I hear:

A librarian, introducing me before my presentation: “Girls, you’re in for a real treat. You’re going to love Shannon Hale’s books. Boys, I expect you to behave anyway.”

A book festival committee member: “Last week we met to choose a keynote speaker for next year. I suggested you, but another member said, ‘What about the boys?’ so we chose a male author instead.”

A parent: “My son read your book and he ACTUALLY liked it!”

A teacher: “I never noticed before, but for read aloud I tend to choose books about boys because I assume those are the only books the boys will like.”

A mom: “My son asked me to read him The Princess in Black, and I said, ‘No, that’s for your sister,’ without even thinking about it.”

A bookseller: “I’ve stopped asking people if they’re shopping for a boy or a girl and instead asking them what kind of story the child likes.”

Like the bookseller, when I do signings, I frequently ask each kid, “What kind of books do you like?” I hear what you’d expect: funny books, adventure stories, fantasy, graphic novels. I’ve never, ever, EVER had a kid say, “I only like books about boys.” Adults are the ones with the weird bias. We’re the ones with the hangups, because we were raised to believe thinking that way is normal. And we pass it along to the kids in sometimes  overt (“Put that back! That’s a girl book!”) but usually in subtle ways we barely notice ourselves.

But we are ready now. We’re ready to notice and to analyze. We’re ready to be thoughtful. We’re ready for change. The girls are ready, the boys are ready, the non-binary kids are ready. The parents, librarians, booksellers, authors, readers are ready. Time’s up. Let’s make a change.

‘sexism hurts men’ factoid actually ironically understated. ‘sexism fucking destroys innocent little boys’ is painfully true and should not be ignored.

WRT the “all minors are children!” post, to me it just showcases how arrogantly antis think they’re always the exception. All minors should listen 100% uncritically to adults, except for them! No one else can handle the effects of fiction, except them! No one else knows how fiction works, or how shipping works, except them! Harassment is bad, unless they’re doing it, then it’s “moral” and justified. They’re self-admitted underdeveloped babies who know nothing, but everyone has to cater to them!

lordhellebore:

I’ve got not much to add. It’s all contradictory and nonsensical. How often have I read “minors are impressionable”, “people’s brains don’t develop fully until age XY” and “that’s why they can’t make decisions about relationships”; and thought: “You’re 16. Ever get the idea that you’re, oh, I don’t know, impressionable and your brain is not fully developed and maybe you’ve not quite as much as a clue about what you’re talking about as you think you do?” 

¯_(ツ)_/¯ But of course, as you said, they’re the exception to the rule. And maybe that’s part of the thrill of being an anti: feeling enlightened somehow, having knowledge of a higher truth they need to spread amongst us lower critters.

I love it when they scream we should be acting like adults and mean “get out of fandom” because to me acting like an adult would be to call their mothers and report that they’re rude little shits who need their Internet privileges taken away.

what-hos-there:

ardwynna:

rsasai:

ardwynna:

ardwynna:

There is never a dull day at my job. This afternoon a guy strolled into the office end of the joint with a backpack, announced that he had goods for sale and started whipping out lingerie and fetish wear. When I asked him if he had anything else he brought out the vibrators.

Since it’s come up, I actually regret not buying the tassel pasties. I’d like to see if the girls can do that helicopter thing before they start to sag.

I would expect this of a stripper.

You are a doctor… like, a medical doctor.

*sits down*

Just… how?

Call it a study of age-related changes in mobility. >_>

Just gonna leave this right here, as well as a disclaimer that actual bellydance performed by professionals is not like this: 

https://youtu.be/mAeHWNECyl8?t=86